Albert Pujols told reporters in the Dominican Republic that he should've been named MVP. He spells out his reasons in this Associated Press story, printed in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
What do you think? Does Pujols have a point, or is he a sore loser?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
85 > 83. Enough said.
I really wouldn't have expected this from him. I would have pegged Pujols to be smarter than this and keep his mouth shut.
I've never understood this line of reasoning. Why should Howard be penalized, and Pujols rewarded, for the fact that the Cards played in a weaker division?
Agreed...if the Phillies played in the Central they would have had there first playoff appearance since 93. Perhaps Puljos should take a look at how a true MVP handles himself. Even if you do not win, it is an honor to even finish second.
Post a Comment